Scroll to top

Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd [2021] NSWCA 166

BStoneAdmin - September 23, 2021 - 0 comments

Judicial review by the NSW Court of Appeal of a District Court judgment concerning a costs assessor’s determination of costs. The Court of Appeal held, inter alia, there was no error by the primary judge.

Main takeaways:

  • Taking a “global” approach to determining the quantum of costs reasonable inter partes is a legitimate approach by a costs assessor and by a review panel;
  • Applying reductions to hourly rates from $550 ph to $460 ph based on such global views is a reasonable approach, and is one which does not require reasons to be provided, as (at [73]):
    An invariable and inevitable feature of (a costs assessor’s) task is to select the appropriate hourly rate, or rates. After a sufficient period of experience, dealing with a great many assessments, many costs assessors would, I apprehend, select an hourly rate somewhat intuitively. It is not a concept that is necessarily reducible to simple articulation of everything that a costs assessor has taken into account in arriving at the hourly rate selected.
  • Application of principles relating to proportionality when considering costs under the old LPA regime (which, unlike LPUL, did not have “proportionality” as a test) are appropriate when considering costs sought relative to the “outcome” of proceedings per LPA s364(2)(f).

Contact us

Our customer service team is happy to help with any questions or requests. Call us on +61 (3) 9606 0027 or send us a message with the form below.